<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 Ssang Yong C200</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carsspyphotos.net/2011-ssang-yong-c200/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carsspyphotos.net/2011-ssang-yong-c200/</link>
	<description>The latest spy shots and pictures of all upcoming new cars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://carsspyphotos.net/2011-ssang-yong-c200/#comment-6612</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carsspyphotos.net/?p=2231#comment-6612</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reserving judgement until we see it without camo. Ssang Yong have produced possibly the worst looking 4x4s ever so it won&#039;t take a lot for an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reserving judgement until we see it without camo. Ssang Yong have produced possibly the worst looking 4x4s ever so it won&#8217;t take a lot for an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Small</title>
		<link>http://carsspyphotos.net/2011-ssang-yong-c200/#comment-6556</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carsspyphotos.net/?p=2231#comment-6556</guid>
		<description>The C200 is a proper monocoque construction, not a ladder chassis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The C200 is a proper monocoque construction, not a ladder chassis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ms</title>
		<link>http://carsspyphotos.net/2011-ssang-yong-c200/#comment-6552</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carsspyphotos.net/?p=2231#comment-6552</guid>
		<description>More promising - and a lot nicer looking! - than their earlier offerings.  About the size of an X-Trail or CR-V, but I have heard rumours that this model is lumbered with the same disadvantage Ssangyongs have always had: a huge weight penalty.  If it&#039;s true that this weighs 1800kg., it might be the same old story.  I thought they had moved on from ladder on frame chassis, but maybe not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More promising &#8211; and a lot nicer looking! &#8211; than their earlier offerings.  About the size of an X-Trail or CR-V, but I have heard rumours that this model is lumbered with the same disadvantage Ssangyongs have always had: a huge weight penalty.  If it&#8217;s true that this weighs 1800kg., it might be the same old story.  I thought they had moved on from ladder on frame chassis, but maybe not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

